% latex2slides -- sample latex files
%
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{color}

\begin{document}
\Large
 
\begin{center}
\colorbox{blue}
{
  {\color{white} \Huge\bf{A study of latex2slides performance}}
}

\vspace*{3cm}

\noindent
{\bf{L.J. Milano$^1$ and Enzo Francescoli$^2$}}
 
\vspace*{3cm}

\normalsize
{
  {\bf $^1$ Fishing Research Institute}\\
  {\bf $^2$ Club Atletico River Plate}
}

\end{center}

\newpage %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\begin{center}
\LARGE{\color{blue}\bf Abstract}
\end{center}
 
{
Using semi-empirical methods as well as ad-hoc hypothesis we were able to show that 
latex2slides is essentially, substantially, fatally inefficient
}

\begin{center}
\LARGE{\color{blue}\bf Some results}
\end{center}

We can show, after some algebraic manipulation that the efficiency of the code behaves as
%
\begin{equation}
  tan^2({\rm efficiency})=\frac 
   {\sum_{\bf k} k_\perp^2 E({\bf k})}
   {\sum_{\bf k} k_\parallel^2 E({\bf k})} \to 0,
\end{equation}
%
that is, \fbox{${\rm efficiency} \to 0$}.

\begin{center}
\LARGE{\color{blue}\bf References}
\end{center}

\begin{description} 
  \item
  [1.] L.J. Milano, 
  {\it J. Fishing Phys.} 1, 1 (1901) 
  \item
  [2.] E. Francescoli, 
  {\it J. River Plate} 95, 203 (1999) 

\end{description} 

\vfill

\end{document}
